Metatron is very good and the Tracker is also very good, but they have some characteristics we must use.
Metatron is very good and the
Tracker is also very good, but they have some characteristics we must use. For example, if you have tumors, it is best to use Metatron for treatment, but if you have advanced cancer metastasis, the Tracker will be better
Another example is that if you have a patient with fibromyalgia Parkinson's multiple sclerosis, then the Tracker will be better, but if your patient has a disease that affects Ford's nerves, then Metatron will be better
Another example is that if you have a person's spine damage, then Metatron will be better, but if he has a lot of damaged spine, the Tracker will be better
It is important that you can arrange them in order of letters, and you will be able to verify which Tracker has more information. For example, you can calculate how many candidates have more than 15 candidates in the Tracker and about 10 Metatron. The microorganisms of the Tracker are larger and the disease list is greater. When we need accuracy, this is very important
Another example is that if the patient's optic nerve is damaged, it is best to use Metatron for treatment, but if all cells in the body need to be treated, the Tracker is better and the two devices complement each other. With the accumulation of time and experience, you will be able to see that in some cases, one is better, and in other cases, the other is better
